Design of a dynamic traffic lights control system文献综述

 2021-11-05 19:22:41

毕业论文课题相关文献综述

To improve the stoplight configuration, the paper projected observation system, which is {able to} be able to confirm 3 street cases (empty street case, traditional street case and jammed street case) by victimization tiny associative memory. The experiments conferred promising results once the projected approach was applied by employing a program to watch one intersection in Penang Island in Malaya. The program may confirm all street cases with completely different climate reckoning on the stream of pictures, that are extracted from the streets video cameras.A distributed, knowledge-based system for real-time and traffic-adaptive control of traffic signals was described by Findler and et al (1997). The system was a learning system in two processes: the first process optimized the control of steady-state traffic at a single intersection and over a network ofstreets while the second stage of learning dealt with predictive/reactive control in responding to sudden changes in traffic patterns. GiYoung et al., (2001) believed that electro sensitive traffic lights had better efficiency than fixed preset traffic signal cycles because they were able to extend orshorten the signal cycle when the number of vehicles increases or decreases suddenly. Their work was centered on creating an optimal traffic signal using fuzzy control. Fuzzy membership function values between 0 and 1 were used to estimate the uncertain length of a vehicle, vehicle speed and width of aroad and different kinds of conditions such as car type, speed, delay in starting time and the volume of cars in traffic were stored. A framework for a dynamic and automatic traffic light control expert system was proposed. The model adopted inter-arrival time and inter-departure time to simulatethe arrival and leaving number of cars on roads. Knowledge base system and rules were used by the model and RFID were deployed to collect road traffic data. This model was able to make decisions that were required to control traffic at intersections depending on the traffic light data collected by theRFID reader. A paper by Tan et al., (1996) described the design and implementation of an intelligent traffic lights controller based on fuzzy logic technology. The researchers developed a software to simulate the situation of an isolated traffic junction based on this technology. Their system was highly graphical in nature, used the Windows system and allowed simulation of different traffic conditions at the junction. The system made comparisons the fuzzy logic controller and a conventional fixed-time controller; and the simulation results showed that the fuzzy logic controller had better performance and was more cost effective.1.Designing traffic light:Introduction:First Traffic Legislation With the commercial revolution still creating its presence detected, railroads and additional significantly fields began to induce flooded with traction-engined vehicles (aka road locomotives). so as to induce from place to put, locomotives had to cross urban, inhabited areas and, despite the very fact they were slow, shouting and not possible to miss, they exhibit quite an threat to the innocent bystanders. Or horses. Scared by the prospects of a decent national obtaining press, additionally as by the prospects of hearing one amongst the damn things huffing and puffing within the quiet of the night, Brits Parliament adopted what became called the Locomotive on Highways Act, in 1861.The provisions of the legislation appear somewhat humorous currently as some have lost their significance over time. A few, however, have fashioned the idea for today's traffic legislation. The legislation, for example, solely explicit that the vehicles' weight ought to be at the most twelve tons and obligatory a 10 mph (16kph) ordinance. No plan however they knew a vehicle is dashing.In 1865, the act was revised and was the Locomotive Act (aka the Red Flag Act). It needed that a automobile, no matter its purpose, be preceded by a person carrying a red flag once traveling on the route - Brits use the route term for any road, together with streets and public footpaths. Speed limits were reduced to four mph (6 kph) in non-urban areas and at 2 mph (3 kph) in cities (still no plan however they caught dashing vehicles "in the act"). yet, the foremost notable addition was the necessity to use a minimum of 3 individuals to work a vehicle: one to drive, a stoker, and one carrying a red flag (hence, the name of the bill) and a lamp. The one with the flag had 2 purposes: he slowed the vehicle down, because it was necessary to drive at walking speed, and warned approaching pedestrians and horse riders of their presence. Of course, you would like to own been blind and deaf miss one on the road. In 1896, the revised Locomotives on Highways Act (or the freeing Act ) eliminated the necessity for a three-person crew, will increase speed limits to fourteen mph (22 kph) and, additional significantly, establishes the sunshine locomotives class or, as we all know it these days, the underneath 3-ton category. To celebrate the legislation, its creator, Harry Lawson, discovered the London to city Run, currently the longest-running automobile event within the world.First Traffic Lights:The Brits introduced the primary traffic lights. albeit the primary road signs came into existence within the town of urban center (Iraq) some four,000 years before Christ, for obvious reasons, the primary traffic lights weren't potential till the late 1800s.Credited to be the primary could be a two-color (red and green) sign, put in outside British people Parliament. It didn't use electricity to perform, however ideally gas, and required to be switched manually. Reports say that a month into service, the light exploded. it absolutely was ne'er recreated once more.The idea, however, was good, thus it absolutely was revived within the North American nation in 1912 by Lester Wire, the person thought-about the artificer of the electrical red-green light. the primary one was put in in 1914 on the corner of East one hundred and fifth Street and geometrician Avenue in Cleveland, Ohio. The three-colour lightweight came as a natural evolution in 1920, at the hands of William Potts. Linking traffic lights along was 1st wiped out Salt Lake town, in 1917, once a switch-controlled traffic in six intersections. machine-controlled traffic lights surfaced in 1922, in Houston. 5 years later, the country that started it all, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland got its 1st lights in Wolverhampton.Traffic controlling Aids used by Traffic police:The whistle is employed to induce the eye of the drivers and pedestrians. it's used as follows:One prolonged blast for a STOP signal.Two short blasts for the signal.Several short blasts to induce the eye of a driver or pedestrian United Nations agencydoes not reply to a given signal.The whistle ought to be used judiciously. It shouldn't be wont toindicate frustration, and also the volume ought to be simply enough to be detected by those whose attention is needed. Therefore, whistle blasts directed at pedestrians ought to be moderate in volume. The whistle ought to be used solely to point stop, go, or to achieve attention, and once its purpose has been achieved, the officer ought to stop sounding the whistle. If the whistle is used unceasingly, it ceases to carry that means for the drivers and pedestrians.The voice is rarely utilized in leading traffic. Arm gestures and also the whistle square measure sometimes enough. There square measure varied reasons why verbal commands aren't used. Verbal orders aren't straightforward to allow or perceive and sometimes result in dangerous misinterpretations. associate order that is loud will antagonize the automobilist. often a driver or pedestrian won't perceive the officer's directions. once this happens, the officer ought to move moderately near to the person and in a well-mannered way and in short justify his/her directions. No officer shall exhibit loss of temper by shouting or otherwise indicate antagonism toward {those United Nations agency those that people who} don't perceive or who don't want to adjust the officer's directions.Use of the torch cone or baton.To stop a driver with the baton, the officer ought to face the oncoming traffic, hold the baton within the mitt, bend the correct elbow, hold the baton vertical then swing the baton from left to all through associate arc of roughly 45 degrees.The GO associated LEFT flip direction square measure constant gestures as those antecedently represented except that the baton acts as an extension of the hand and index fingers. Signals and directions given with the help of the baton ought to be exaggerated and sometimes got to be continual owing to restricted visibility. The baton lightweight ought to be turned off once it's not actively utilised to allow directions.A torch alone may also be wont to halt traffic, however less effective and safe than with a cone attachment. to prevent traffic, slowly swing the beam of sunshine across the trail of the oncoming traffic. The beam from the torch strikes the pavement as associate elongated spot of sunshine. once the motive force has stopped, arm signals could also be given within the usual manner, the vehicles' headlights providing illumination.STATIC traffic control SYSTEMThe static traffic control system (TCS) is split into four types1. Pre-timed signaling2. Solid state Pre-timed signaling 3. Pre-timed actuated Signaling 4. Webster MethodA. Pre-timed signalingThe operation of the signal system could also be coordinated before the vehicles are often stopped or sanctioned without the belief of a predetermined "fixed cycle" length and "division between different methods of ore." Vehicle demand. With the setting of the signal reference unit shown, the signal's time-connection is additionally pre-selected for typical signals. Any of those features are often changed consistent with specific needs.In the previous signaling system operation, the signal system range is controlled by the signal policy, the request of the frame signal interval. the quantity of your time each given a chance during a signal arrangement is specified by a brief order setup. Determined locally or remotely by the beginning time and / or signal plan programs within the specific temporary order and / or the tip time of the clock or equivalent device.Traffic volumes may use pre-timed control at broken crossing points in unexpected places. Alternatively, the establishment should soon be supplied with neighboring divisions.The simplest sort of signalization is pre-timed control. In pre-timed signal control, the cycle length, stages, and non-adaptive times and spaces are beat advance to change. This defined cycle is updated in cycle length, phase, and unprecedented times, and temporarily adjusts the stationary request. About Controller Instrumentation, some preemptive timing models are often used. Multi-dial controllers have distinct timing plans that are released from time to time within the preceding days. for instance, three-dial controllers typically have different signal timing arrangements for AM, Off- Crest, and PM conditions.B. Solid-state Pre-timed Control. In the early L980s, the producers began releasing early time controllers in sight of solid-state circuits. Dial motors and cam shafts of electromechanical controllers are replaced with software-driven devices. Timings are specialized by the utilization of your time settings set in time. Cam shafts are cut with signal arrangements in prom chips. Fresher models of the controllers won't bother that the program is sold. the specified efficiencies of electromechanical are copied, but this is often done digitally. Many additional features like overtime arrangements, signal plans and detention recognition capabilities are included. Solid-state pre-time controllers aren't suitable for manufacturers.C. Pre-timed actuated controlThe front-controlled control uses an equivalent controller as shown within the first section, which may wire within the hardware control of the vehicle intensity. Identification methods include the controller within the most indicated portion until a vehicle is detected. this sort of operation may be a central point to permit the controller to stick to the green condition and be the most important within the primary street. Any disadvantage controller should complete the flag break and don't effectively allow time to interrupt up. Solid-state controllers, control plans additionally, the world's time arrangements are gradually adjusted within the city, little question beyond the brands, almost fully controlled controller.D. Webster MethodWebster Method is intended for the best pre-timed signal control. He conducted an experiment about the pre-timed isolated control in 1950s. From this strategy he designed two phases, which was the signal phase and, the split phase. He proved that Webster method minimizes the delay. The system should have critical phase timings and equal degree of saturation. The Webster method derived two equations, one was for cycle length shown in Eq.and another one was delay equation shown in below Eq.0 = 1.5 5 (1) 1Where,0 - Optimum minimum cycle length. - Total lost time within the cycle - Sum of critical phase flow rationThe Delay Equation is given by= 0.65( 2) (2) (1)2 2(1)2 2(1)1 3 (2 5)Where, Average Delay per vehicle for particular lane or one iteration Cycle Length in seconds Flow vehicles in Seconds Proportion of the effective green with reference to cycle length Degree of the saturationAdvantages and Disadvantages for Static Signal Control:The distinct advantage of machine-driven control was the price of manual control. In 1928 the big apple town had AN calculable a pair of,243 machine-driven signal controllers (Hoyt, 1927). From the amount of 1925-1928, the the big apple town local department reduced its traffic squad from vi,000 officers to five hundred as an immediate result of the supplemental machine-driven signal controllers. This reduction in hands resulted in an exceedingly savings of $12,500,000 annually (Kane and Finestone, 1928). This magnitude of savings wasn't restricted to the big apple town, and municipalities across the U.S. found they too might save millions by shift to machine-driven traffic signals. Traffic officers in Syracuse, American state claim that additionally to exaggerated time periods within the central city district, the complete value of implementing the new machine-driven signal system was recovered within the initial year by the savings created in officer wage (Walrath, 1925).Additionally, machine-driven traffic signals excelled were manual control struggled; in coordinating movements between close intersections. machine-driven signals allowed intersections among a passageway to be regular in order that a driver might receive a inexperienced signal over the complete span of the passageway. The coordinated signal system was found to be simpler than officers coordinating from traffic towers (Hoyt, 1927; Marsh, 1927). However, the extra coordination wasn't while not its drawbacks. it had been found that drivers would race down a coordinated passageway, trying to stay up with the traffic signals (McShane, 1999). in an exceedingly traffic survey of metropolis (PA) in 1929, 341 mechanically regular signal intersections underneath coordinated management were evaluated for safety. The study found that collisions exaggerated by forty per cent (Marsh, 1930). Marsh attributed the rise in accidents to poor implementation of the traffic signals and not coordination.The tilt over machine-driven signal management was immediate with the unfold of the implementation of the new system. Outspoken traffic analysis skilled Miller McClintock believed that the new signals would ne'er replace cops (McClintock, 1923). E. P. Goodrich, a authority engineer for the Borough of Manhattan, discharged machine-driven signal management as a fad that might pass and steered town not waste the money for his or her implementation (Goodrich, 1927). William Philp Eno, thought of to be the daddy of road safety explicit students of traffic are getting down to understand the false economy of automatically controlled traffic, and handicraft by trained officers can once more prevail (Eno, 1927). The State of latest Jersey needed manual {traffic management control} for all state highways as a result of officers believed machine-driven signal control to be inefficient for his or her truck-line highways (Marsh, 1927). Underlining these issues was the assumption that while not a political candidate gift to enforce traffic laws at AN intersection, drivers and pedestrians would do as they please (McShane, 1999).The push to beat the obstacles faced by machine-driven signal management came from the engineering field. supported the work done by early traffic engineers it had been plain that machine-driven control, as a way of general observe in urban environments was simpler as a result of coordinated systems and a lot of economical financially, if by no alternative live. However, it had been left to the engineering field to win over the travel public. To do this, engineering organizations collaborated with public and personal representatives of the driving community. moreover, police agencies provided support to the movement to machine-driven signals by imposing the primary instalments of the new system. The success of those efforts is axiomatic these days. By 1930, semaphores, traffic towers and manual control in urban areas for routine traffic conditions was a factor of the past (Sessions, 1971). From now on machine-driven control was the dominate control live utilized in developed countries.After the Twenties manual control was reserved for guiding special event and emergency traffic. Conditions wherever routine control plans don't adequately offer the capability required for rare events. The previous analysis comparison manual control to machine-driven control solely evaluates these ways for routine conditions and not their common observe these days. The analysis techniques used throughout now (Cura 1925) to match manual and automatic signal management were qualitative, not presenting any information on traffic speed, travel time, volume, etc. moreover, advancements in each field over the last ninety years warrant a brand-new comparison between the control measures. There exists a spot within the analysis that mandates a mensuration between manual control and trendy signal controllers to be used throughout planned special events and emergencies.Process:The traffic light procedure is a classical case using in the plc. It is commonly used for Timers and Step Ladder instruction (STL) to implement in reality. It has a complicated procedure with a low implementing rate. This article uses the increment and the comparison instructions to implement. In concert with the s7-1200 as the design background, the portal software can help the procedures become more straightforward and flexible.This case requires that the North and South red lights on 30 seconds, the East and West green lights on25 seconds, flash for two seconds, and the East and West yellow lights on 3 seconds; and itcorresponds to the East and West red light on 30 seconds, the North and South green light on 25seconds with flash two seconds, and the North and South yellow lights on.The design is driven by the system clock contact M0.5 connects 60 times as a cycle. There are sixsteps to achieving light control with this procedure. M0.5 implements the flash, and the comparisoninstruction implements the switching. The application diagram shows below:Table 1. Traffic Light I/O Allocation Table PLC Input Terminal Light PLC Output Terminal Touch screen start or remote control North South Green Lights Q0.0 North South Yellow Lights Q0.1 North South Red Lights Q0.2 West East Green Lights Q0.3 West East Yellow Lights Q0/4 West East Red Lights Q0.5 The procedure consists of counting, West-East red lights on and the North and South Red light on program segments. The procedure shows below. The first program segment takes the system clock contact M0.5 in the signal rise along the position operand instruction to connect the increment instruction to count.M0.5 under the speed loop of 1 second per cycle to connect. The MW12 value corresponds to the time value of seconds while using the comparison instruction to count 60 times after the MW12 to clear zero to achieve circular motion. Figure 2. Counting Program The second program uses the comparison instructions to determine the three situations below: less than 25 seconds, between 25 to 27 seconds, or between 27 to 30 seconds. The green light flicker is still under control by using M0.5 contacts. The third program segment is similar to the second program. When MW12 equals to 30, swap status of north and south according to comparison instruction. This experiment uses the increment instruction (INC) under the Mathematics function instruction and the M0.5 of the system clock instruction to calculate the traffic light operation time. Without using any timer can simplify the procedure. Compared with the order control with timer, this experiment can save at least three to six timers. The method adopted here is sequential control design method, which use the numerical comparison to set the sequence of sequential control. This method is more rule-based, easy to understand and adjust than the experiential design method. And it also has a relatively high practical value.2. The world of S7-1200:The S7-1200 programmable logic controller (PLC) provides the flexibility and power to control a wide variety of devices in support of your automation needs. The compact design, flexible configuration, and powerful instruction set combine to make the S7-1200 a perfect solution for controlling a wide variety of applications. The CPU combines a microprocessor, an integrated power supply, input circuits, and output circuits in a compact housing to create a powerful PLC. The S7-1200 family provides a variety of signal modules and signal boards for expanding the capabilities of the CPU. You can also install additional communication modules to support other communication protocols.The SIMATIC S7-1200 compact controller is the modular, space-saving controller for small automation systems that require either simple or advanced functionality for logic, HMI and networking. The compact design, low cost, and powerful features make the S7-1200 a perfect solution for controlling small applications. As part of the SIMATIC commitment to "totally integrated automation" (TIA), the S7-1200 product family and the TIA Portal programming software give you the flexibility you need to solve your automation needs.Traffic models can be classified into two categories based on the type of analysis they can perform: optimization models and simulation models. Optimization model are used to develop optimal signal control plans for intersections, corridors and networks. Optimization could be done using mathematical techniques, hill-climb simulation iterations or other advanced techniques such as genetic algorithms or neural networks. These may include capacity calculations, cycle length, splits optimization and coordination/offset plans. Some optimization models can also be used for optimizing ramp metering rates for freeway ramp control. The most common optimization models for traffic signal design include SYNCHRO, TRANSYT and PASSER3.Methodology: The Totally Integrated Automation (TIA) Portal software gives a user-friendly environmentto develop, edit, and monitor the logic needed to manage your application.The TIA Portal provides the resources for managing and configuring all of the devices in yourproject, like PLCs and HMI devices. As a component of the TIA Portal, STEP 7 Basicprovides multiple programming languages (LAD and FBD) for assistance and adaptableness inbuilding the control program for your application. The TIA Portal also provides the toolsfor creating and constructing the HMI devices in your project.The most crucial steps in TIA Portal that I used are:● Creating the project● Configuring the hardware● Networking the devices● Programming the PLC● Loading the configuration dataNowadays, nearly all the crossroads adopt the electric traffic lights control system. Some of them are based on SCM (Single-chip Microcomputer) or MCU (Micro Control Unit), others are based on PLC (Programmable Logic Controller). Considering that PLC possesses higher stability than SCM in various weather conditions, this project selects PLC as the controller of the traffic lights.In addition, some traditional electric traffic lights are controlled by static time. However, the traffic loads on different directions are usually not eternal. For example, the number of cars who want to go across the crossroad from the South to the North or from the North to the South is 1.5 times than that who wants to go across the crossroad from the East to the West or from the West to the East during 7:30AM to 9:00AM. But the above ratio may change to 0.7 during 10:00AM to 11:30. Taking the number of traffic in different directions into account and dynamically adjusting the transit time may reduce the invalid waiting time as much as possible.

以上是毕业论文文献综述,课题毕业论文、任务书、外文翻译、程序设计、图纸设计等资料可联系客服协助查找。